for a flat income tax and we wouldn't have marriage as part of the tax code. health insurance, i think there is a way to write it where it would be neutral and you wouldn't bring marriage into the idea of health insurance. >> chris: i want to go back to your filibuster, in which you argued against the president's drone policy, especially, with regard to targeting of american citizens on american soil. after you would filibuster for 13 hours, you got this letter from attorney general holder, in which he wrote: does the president have the authority to use a weaponized drone to kill an american not engaged in combat on american soil? the answer to that, is no. senator paul, after your filibuster you said you were happy with that letter, but, in fact, doesn't it leave a huge loophole because it seems to me, what attorney general holder is saying, just by implication, or -- is that the president does have the authority to use the drone strike on an american on u.s. soil, who is involved in combat. >> well, see, here's the thing, i have never argued against -- if pe